The belief-function approach to aggregating audit evidence
نویسنده
چکیده
In this article, we present the belief-function approach to aggregating audit evidence. The approach uses an evidential network to represent the structure of audit evidence. In turn, it allows us to treat all types of dependencies and relationships among accounts and items of evidence, and thus the approach should help the auditor conduct an efficient and effective audit. Aggregation of evidence is equivalent to propagation of beliefs in an evidential network. The paper describes in detail the three major steps involved in the propagation process. The first step deals with drawing the evidential network representing the connections among variables and items of evidence, based on the experience and judgment of the auditor. We then use the evidential network to determine the clusters of variables over which we have belief functions. The second step deals with constructing a Markov tree from the clusters of variables determined in step one. The third step deals with the propagation of belief functions in the Markov tree. We use a moderately complex example to illustrate the details of the aggregation process. Srivastava, Rajendra. (1995) The Belief-Function Approach to Aggregating Audit Evidence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 10 (3), 329-356. Publisher's Official Version: . Open Access Version: .
منابع مشابه
Audit Decisions Using Belief Functions: A Review
This article provides an overview of the audit process along with the belief-function approach to audit decisions. In particular, the article highlights the advantages of using belief functions for representing uncertainties in the audit evidence and discusses the audit risk model of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants as a plausibility model. Also, the article discusses the ...
متن کاملAudit Risk Formula with Mixed Evidence
The financial statement audit is the process of collecting, evaluating, and aggregating relevant items of evidence pertaining to various management assertions related to the financial statement accounts to determine whether the company’s financial statements present fairly its financial position. The Dempster-Shafer theory [1] of belief functions has been argued to be an appropriate framework f...
متن کاملAudit Judgments Using Belief versus Probability Assessment
This experimental study of 96 experienced auditors examines whether auditors’ judgments are influenced by the ‘approach’ used by the auditors in uncertainty assessment and by the ‘framing’ of an audit assertion to be verified. Approach was manipulated by using belief functions and probability theory as the manner in which uncertainty was assessed. Differences in framing were manipulated by stat...
متن کاملThe Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management: An Experimental Study with Evidence from IPO
According to a method of earnings management activities that administrators can manage reported earnings from the definition of real activity. In particular they can be located across time and activities in a way that accounting period to achieve a certain revenue target. Conservative attitudes of auditors in presenting their views about the independence of the auditor can considered as a remar...
متن کاملbelief function and the transferable belief model
Beliefs are the result of uncertainty. Sometimes uncertainty is because of a random process and sometimes the result of lack of information. In the past, the only solution in situations of uncertainty has been the probability theory. But the past few decades, various theories of other variables and systems are put forward for the systems with no adequate and accurate information. One of these a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Intell. Syst.
دوره 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995